In this Oct. 4, 2018, Pennsylvania Corrections Department mail inspector Brian Strawser sorts inmate mail at Camp Hill state prison in Camp Hill, Pa. Pennsylvania prison officials say new mail handling procedures and other changes appear to have helped address a spate of incidents this year in which correctional officers and other staff have sought medical treatment believed to be caused by exposure to synthetic marijuana that was smuggled into state prisons.
Katie Meyer was WITF’s Capitol Bureau Chief from 2016-2020. While at WITF, she covered all things state politics for public radio stations throughout Pennsylvania. Katie came to Harrisburg by way of New York City, where she worked at Fordham University’s public radio station, WFUV, as an anchor, general assignment reporter, and co-host of an original podcast. A 2016 graduate of Fordham, she earned several awards for her work at WFUV, including four 2016 Gracies.
Katie is a native New Yorker, though she originally hails from Troy, a little farther up the Hudson River. She can attest that the bagels are still pretty good there.
WITF's Capitol Bureau Chief Desk is partially funded through generous gifts made in the memory of Tony May through the Anthony J. May Memorial Fund.
(Pittsburgh) — The Pennsylvania chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has filed two lawsuits against the state for what it sees as overly restrictive policies on legal mail sent to prisoners.
The ACLU claims the policy violates prisoners’ rights to speak confidentially with their lawyers—while the Department of Corrections says it’s necessary to keep out drugs.
An updated legal mail policy went into effect a few months ago after a rash of illnesses among staff that were attributed to an influx of powerful, synthetic drugs.
Instead of directly giving inmates letters from their lawyers, the DOC now photocopies them in front of recipients, then temporarily retains the original in a secure container while inmates are given the copy.
ACLU Legal Director Vic Walczak said his and other legal groups have been advised by an ethics counsel, that system isn’t secure enough because corrections staff could potentially access mail.
“If lawyers can’t have these kinds of controversial discussions with their clients, this goes to the very heart of our justice system,” he said.
One of the suits is on behalf of an inmate at the state correctional institution at Smithfield, who’s in the middle of active legal battle. His Pittsburgh-based public defender doesn’t feel comfortable sending letters.
The other is on behalf of the ACLU and three additional groups that defend inmates.
Walczak noted, the organizations have issues with a lot of the DOC’s recent restrictions on prisoner communications, including general mail and stricter guidelines for receiving books.
But legal mail, he said, was the most urgent. He estimated that “this really is interfering with hundreds, if not thousands of legal transactions.”
He said the ACLU is aiming to fast-track the suits. They plan to move for a preliminary injunction and hope to get a hearing sometime before Christmas.
Walczak and the other complainants argue the policy is unnecessary, as instances of drugs mailed through legal letters are rare.
DOC Secretary John Wetzel doesn’t contest that. He has said the policy is preemptive—he’s worried that since the DOC tightened its general mail policy, drug-smugglers may try legal mail as an alternative.
A spokeswoman for the DOC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. In previous interviews, DOC officials have said they don’t intend to change the legal mail policy.