Pa. Supreme Court expected to unveil new congressional map today

  • By Katie Meyer

WOLF MAP-thumb-508xauto-36775.jpg

Governor Tom Wolf submitted a map that he said “has the same number of overall splits as the Republican leaders’ joint submission but reduces the number of counties split more than once.”

Here are the most prominent perspectives on this story. We are on the lookout for stereotypes and assumptions in our own work, and we invite you to point out what we may have missed. Contact us on our Trusting News page.  We’ve been covering this issue for months. Find the full breadth of the coverage here:


(Harrisburg) — A monthlong debacle over redrawing Pennsylvania’s unconstitutional congressional maps is coming to an end.

Today is the deadline the state Supreme Court gave itself to either pick new maps from a number of submissions, or draw its own.

But, state Republican leaders think the court’s own actions are unconstitutional and say they don’t plan to accept new maps lying down.

Last month, Pennsylvania’s Democratic-majority Supreme Court declared the state’s 2011 congressional map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander favoring Republicans.

Justices made a controversial call for lawmakers to redraw it in time for the 2018 election.


That meant the GOP-controlled General Assembly had three weeks to agree on new district lines, and Democratic Governor Tom Wolf had six days to review and approve them.

Republicans immediately called the deadline unworkable.

And as Senate Appropriations Chair Pat Browne noted at the time, it didn’t help that the court announced its ruling, then waited until two days before the legislature’s deadline to give specific requirements.

“Any guidance that’s available to us to meet their stipulations as far as what they want is a total mystery to us, but we’re trying to accommodate their ruling,” he said.

Ultimately, justices said they wanted the map to be fairer and specified, districts should be more compact and contiguous, and should split fewer municipalities.

That kicked off intense debate over what “fairness” really means. Senate GOP Leader Jake Corman decries the metric as totally subjective.

“There’s not any standard in what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said or anywhere in the federal government or any court ever that says competitiveness is a standard,” he said.

After running out of time to get legislative votes on new maps, House and Senate Republicans, House Democrats, Senate Democrats, Governor Wolf, and several other parties to the case submitted completely separate proposals to the court.

They’re all technically more compact than the current map, and split fewer municipalities.


But it’s not clear how justices will assess them, or even how seriously they’ll consider them.

Their order says if none of the maps are up to snuff, they’ll turn to their own expert to draw maps for the court.

Republicans say that amounts to justices usurping the legislature and governor’s ability to draw congressional maps.

Corman even called it a potential constitutional crisis.

“We’re going to have a Stanford professor come into Pennsylvania, and he’s going to act as the prosecutor by presenting the evidence, the juror by evaluating the evidence, and he solely is going to act as a judge by producing a map for the people of Pennsylvania to live under<‘ he said.

Corman says if the justices choose their own map today, the House and Senate GOP will sue in federal court.

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Up Next
Politics & Policy

Episode 43: What does 'fair' even mean?