Radio Smart Talk for Wednesday, July 13:
Pennsylvania's charter schools performed better than public schools in some areas but not as well in others. Those mixed results from Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes were a bit of a surprise for some who expected the state's 135 charter schools and 12 cyber charter schools would fare better than their public school counterparts. The thinking was that charter schools could specialize on the basics of reading and math while public schools had other issues they had to deal with.
According to the Stanford study, 30% of charter schools fared better than public schools in reading while 25% of charters outperformed public schools in math.
Cyber charter school students, who take classes at home via the internet, performed significantly worse than public school students.
Who pays the cost of educating a student at a public charter school has also been an issue. When a student leaves a local district and enrolls at a charter school, the money follows the student as the local district pays. A proposal has been made that would have make funding of charter schools a state responsibility.
Wednesday's Radio Smart Talk will examine the state of charter schools in Pennsylvania.
LISTEN TO PROGRAM:















comments
Charter Schools discard 60 percent of students within a year, keeping only the highest performing. The should be ashamed
For more information please visit our website at www.sseschool.org, email president@ssesc hool.org or attend our Open House on July 21, 5:30PM @ 215 N. Front Street, Harrisburg.
When a Charter School entices a student the school should be forced to accept that student for a minimum of a full school year as long as the parent wishes the child to attend. Charter Schools should be forced to provide identical services as provided by the student's home District; if pre- or after school meals are provided then the Charter School should also have to provide them. If mentally or physically disadvantaged students wish to attend a Charter School the school should be forced to accept them, as the local School District currently must. Taxpayers in Districts from which students are drawn should be have representation on Charter School Boards.
Taxpayers in Districts from which students are drawn should be have representation on Charter School Boards.
Should read:
Taxpayers in Districts from which students are drawn should be granted representation on Charter School Boards.
Privately funded schools, Church schools and Home schooling can be more effective than Public schools, especially academically, in many (most ?) individual cases. The same can be said of any selective-admission institution, such as Charter schools. One problem with PA's effort at Charter schools is that the Charter can suck whatever money they want out of the local taxpayer funded Public schools with no local taxpayer input or control. It is also a fact that (some) Charter schools cherry pick desirable students from local Public schools but as soon as the student does not meet the performance standards they are dumped back into the Public schools who are then left to try to undo the emotional damage inflicted on the child and parent by having been being deemed inadequate. You should compare taxpayer funded Charter schools' performance with other Private and Church Schools, and not with the Public schools who must take every student who shows up.
RSS feed for comments to this post