giveNow_Button
News Smart Talk How you can be impacted by not raising the debt ceiling?
Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:09

How you can be impacted by not raising the debt ceiling?

Written by  Scott LaMar, Director of Radio Smart Talk

Radio Smart Talk for Wednesday, July 27:

For weeks the debate has raged in Washington about increasing the nation's debt ceiling.  The drop dead date is August 2 -- next Tuesday.  If there is no agreement between Republicans and Democrats in Congress and the White House, the U.S. could default on its $14,000,000,000,000 in debts.

President Obama told a nationwide audience Monday night that the debate between the parties had become a three-ring circus.  Polls up until this point have shown most Americans have not been paying much attention.  That's even though every American could be impacted with higher interest rates and prices or delayed Social Security checks if the U.S. defaults.

There's no doubt the two parties have used the debt ceiling debate to score political points.  Republicans have insisted on big spending cuts, saying the federal government is spending too much, if they are to support raising the ceiling.  Democrats have signaled they're willing to go along with spending reductions but also believe there is a need for increased taxes in some areas -- something Republicans refuse to consider.

What does it all means to you?  On Wednesday's Radio Smart Talk, Scott Ehrig, Vice President and Regional Portfolio Manager M&T Investment Group - Private Client Services, joins us to explain.

What questions do you have about the debt ceiling?  Are you concerned about your own finances, investments or retirement plans if there is no agreement before August 2?

LISTEN TO PROGRAM:  

comments  

 
# Patrick.H 2011-07-26 17:50
I really wish the republicans would stop overplaying their hand. What do you think?
Poll: Obama vs Boehner ; vote: http://www.wepolls.com/p/1555999/
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Alex Burger 2011-07-27 09:53
Is there any truth to the story that Eric Cantor has holdings from which he would benefit if there is no agreement on the debt limit.
Supposedly, Cantor’s investment in ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF means he could stand to gain if the debt ceiling is not raised. The fund bets against U.S. government bonds, and if the country were to default on its debts, the value of Cantor’s fund could increase.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Cathy 2011-07-27 10:06
Most people have short memories it seems. There is much talk about current reckless spending. When did it originate? In the Bush years. Clinton left us with a huge budget surplus. If his prudence had been followed, we would be paying down the national debt right now. But no, you can't cut entitlements when the government is flush with money, so what did Bush do? Got rid of the surplus and put us into deficit spending. First the tax cuts, which the wealthy do NOT need and which do not create jobs (where have the jobs been the last two years???) and then the multi-trillion dollar war in Iraq, which was based on lies. (Yes, they knew they were lying.) So stop blaming the Democrats and put the blame squarely where it belongs. (Remember, now that the government is NOT flush with money, they can cut entitlements.)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Bonnie 2011-07-27 12:55
I totally agree with every word you said and there is so much more. why do the republicans turn a deaf ear on the precious George W Bush . He has been rated as the Worst President of all times and I totally agree !
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Joe Pascavage 2011-07-28 10:09
The word 'Entitlments' is used to indicate a target for cutting monies to save an economy, but not in describing the actions of business/government when they lower water quality standards to accomodate the gas-fracking industry, or when they allowed lead into gasoline and paint. I heard (maybe on Public Radio) that ".....we can't afford to handle lead poison and adults", and that is an indication that the anti-socialist (or anti-lawful/legal) proponents of national policy are willing to avoid responsibility for endangering health, with the amendment that "loser-pays".
There are connection to the health problem in this country that are not covered by cutting health expenditures.
The real parts of the problem aren't even being addressed!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Jason Mowery 2011-07-28 22:35
I would like to listen to this program but the podcast link seems to be broken.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Joe Pascavage 2011-07-28 23:51
I clicked the right-pointing-arrow below;
'LISTEN TO THE PROGRAM' @11.34 PM, and the link was working.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Jason Mowery 2011-07-29 09:26
I am looking for the PODCAST link though.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Jason Mowery 2011-07-29 09:27
The podcast link is broken, I am unable to download yesterday or for this one.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# witf 2011-07-29 09:40
Hi Jason,

Thank you for pointing out that the podcast link wasn't working correctly. We have fixed it. You can now listen to it here: http://witf.vo.llnwd.net/o35/smarttalk/radiosmarttalk/RST_July272011.mp3.

We apologize for the inconvenience and thanks for listening!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Radio Smart Talk Sponsors

pinnaclehealth300x75

CBC300x75

Smart Talk TV Sponsors

PPL300x75

PSMSHMC300x75

Stay Connected to witf

Ticket Giveaway Button
ListenLIVE_Button
WatchNow_Button

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »