News

Justices explain decision in gerrymandering case

Written by The Associated Press | Feb 7, 2018 6:15 PM
congressional_map_redistricting_gerrymandering.jpg

(Harrisburg) -- A Pennsylvania Supreme Court majority is explaining why it found the state's widely criticized congressional district boundaries to be unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit Republicans last month.

In a 139-page majority opinion released late Wednesday afternoon, Justice Debra Todd wrote that the plan violates the elections clause of the state's Constitution.

She writes that a map of congressional districts violates that clause when neutral standards such as compact and contiguous districts are subordinated for unfair partisan political advantage.

She says those standards were written into the state constitution in 1874 to address gerrymandering concerns in state legislative districts, and says those neutral benchmarks are suitable to apply to a congressional map.

The court struck down the Republican-drawn district boundaries on Jan. 22. The justices' 5-2 decision broke along partisan lines, with Democrats in the majority.

The court's majority gave lawmakers until this Friday to produce a replacement. Otherwise, the justices say they'll adopt a plan for this year's elections.

Tagged under , , , , ,

back to top

Give Now

Estate Planning

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Smart Talk

National Edward R. Murrow Awards

DuPont Columbia Awards

Support Local Journalism

Latest News from NPR

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »