News

Winners and losers under proposed school aid formula

Written by The Associated Press | Jun 29, 2015 11:39 AM
school_classroom_handsraised.jpg

(Harrisburg) -- A new public school funding formula being considered by the state legislature would create winners and losers as it seeks a way to link the distribution of state aid more closely to need.

Shrinking school districts that were previously spared aid cutbacks -- many in western Pennsylvania --  would see their share of aid come in lower under the proposed new formula, an Associated Press analysis found. 

But many of Pennsylvania's biggest cities and fastest-growing suburbs -- believed to have been shortchanged previously -- would get a larger slice of aid for public school instruction and operations.

Here's a further examination and breakdown of the plan from the AP, including which counties and districts would see the biggest gains and which would see the biggest losses:  
 

SHARE OF WINNERS, LOSERS  
All told, 162 districts would get a bigger share of aid that is distributed through the new formula compared to the share of aid the districts received this year, the AP found.

Nearly twice as many, 308, would get a smaller share; 30 would see no difference. 

No district's aid would drop below the amount it now receives even if it continues to shrink.  

 

HOW IT WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED  
The Legislature has not settled when to start using the formula or how much money to distribute through it.

For instance, districts may continue to receive the amount of aid they got this year and only dollars allotted above that baseline amount would be carved up differently under the new formula. 

But it would change how at least some aid to Pennsylvania's 500 school districts would be distributed after more than two decades of lawmakers and governors bending the formula to their will. 

 
WHAT'S DIFFERENT ABOUT THE NEW FORMULA  
It places more emphasis on need. 

It would recognize a district's number of low-income students, including those living below the federal poverty level, as well as their percentage of enrollment.

It also would, for the first time, recognize charter school costs, geographic size and financial wherewithal to fund schools with local taxes. The number of English-language learners would also be a factor, as it has only intermittently in the past. 

 

PERCENTAGE SHARE FOR 10 LARGEST DISTRICTS (by student population):  

     Philadelphia: 18.8 percent; up from 17.8 percent.  
     Pittsburgh: 1.75; down from 2.75.  
     Central Bucks (Bucks County): 0.46; up from 0.30.  
     Allentown: 2.94; up from 1.76.  
     Reading: 3.86; up from 2.12.  
     Bethlehem: 0.88; up from 0.51.  
     Erie City: 1.78; up from 1.04.  
     North Penn (Montgomery County): 0.28; up from 0.16.  
     Downingtown Area (Chester County): 0.251; up from 0.248.  
     Upper Darby (Delaware): 0.85; up from 0.62.  

EXPLANATION: Pittsburgh is a loser here after being protected from losing money amid steep declines in student population in the past two decades. Winners include districts that educate large proportions of the poorest students  -- such as Philadelphia, Allentown and Reading -- and did not shrink as fast, and suburban districts that are growing, including North Penn, Downingtown Area and Upper Darby.

10 DISTRICTS WITH BIGGEST INCREASE IN PERCENTAGE SHARE (in order of biggest gain):  
     Reading  
     Allentown  
     Philadelphia  
     Lancaster City  
     York City  
     Erie City  
     Wilkes-Barre Area  
     Pocono Mountain (Monroe County)  
     Harrisburg City  
     Bethlehem Area  

EXPLANATION: Cities are dealing with the poorest, most challenging students to educate, and this formula is designed to help deliver more aid to address that. Pocono Mountain is an example of a growing suburban district that was relatively neglected. 

 

10 DISTRICTS WITH BIGGEST DECREASE IN PERCENTAGE SHARE (in order of biggest loss):  
     Pittsburgh  
     Altoona Area  
     Armstrong  
     Pleasant Valley (Monroe County)  
     Connellsville Area (Fayette County)  
     Warren County  
     Penncrest (Crawford County)  
     Punxsutawney Area (Jefferson County)  
     Penn-Trafford (Westmoreland County)  
     Forest Hills (Cambria County)  

EXPLANATION: All these counties are in western Pennsylvania, where the state's biggest population losses have occurred since 1990, when governors and lawmakers in the state began discounting the importance of student population changes in determining how to divide up state aid among school districts. The result was that districts with shrinking student populations continued to receive more aid. 

10 COUNTIES WITH BIGGEST INCREASE IN PERCENTAGE SHARE (in order of biggest gain):
     Berks  
     Lehigh  
     Lancaster  
     York  
     Philadelphia  
     Montgomery  
     Delaware  
     Monroe  
     Luzerne  
     Dauphin  

EXPLANATION: The increases in these counties are largely driven by the increased share for a big city, though a couple -- Monroe, Montgomery and Delaware -- would get larger shares based on growing student populations. 

 

10 COUNTIES WITH BIGGEST LOSS IN PERCENTAGE SHARE (in order of biggest loss):
     Westmoreland  
     Washington  
     Beaver  
     Cambria  
     Blair  
     Allegheny  
     Butler  
     Fayette  
     Indiana  
     Somerset  

EXPLANATION: The counties with the biggest proposed loss in share of school dollars are in western Pennsylvania, where the state's biggest population losses have occurred.

Published in News

Tagged under , , ,

back to top

Post a comment

Give Now

Estate Planning

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Smart Talk

National Edward R. Murrow Awards

DuPont Columbia Awards

Support Local Journalism

Latest News from NPR

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »