News

Farm bill cuts food stamps, despite elevated demand in recent years

Written by Ben Allen, General Assignment Reporter | Feb 24, 2014 4:00 AM

(Harrisburg) -- President Obama recently signed a five-year version of the farm bill that cuts food stamp funding by $9 billion over the next ten yearsBut outside the debate over the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, demand for food across the midstate remains nearly as high as it did during the peak of the recession in 2010.

For the past couple years, debate over the farm bill has gone back and forth in Congress.

Analysis by witf of 15 counties in the midstate generally shows a dramatic increase in demand for food stamps from 2009 to 2010, and steady growth into 2011.

By 2012, some counties saw a decrease, but in many cases, the demand has just plateaued and remained at elevated levels since.

In the middle of the debate are the people though, and the ones I talked to don’t even factor into the food stamps numbers.

They’re people like William, who works for the trucking company Transcorps in Harrisburg, but didn't want to provide his last name.

He's a single dad with a son, but says his hourly wage isn't enough to cover his bills.

So every couple weeks, he goes to the Cupboard at Calvary, at the Calvary United Methodist Church. It's across from Central Dauphin Middle School in the Colonial Park neighborhood outside Harrisburg.

"It makes a big difference, I’ve got a single 5 year old son, and it helps a lot."

His choice is a stark one, if he didn't have the Cupboard at Calvary.

“I probably would have to pick up another two part-time jobs to make ends meet."

In the gym filled with food and little else, with stories similar to Williams’s, about 100 people wait in simple chairs to hear their number get called.

William says without the help, his grocery bill would be another $100 to 150 a month, and food stamps aren’t an option.

"I make too much for that. At least that’s what the state of Pennsylvania says."

Every two weeks, people can take home six pounds of food per person in their household.

That includes fresh vegetables and fruit, salads, bread, cereal, snack bars, and other pantry staples.

Demand rises

The Central Pennsylvania Food Bank warehouse can feel like it goes on forever, and then some.

A couple of years ago, it doubled its capacity thanks to donations from corporations and others.

"Strategically we have been preparing for years. We thought with the government picture, with budget cutting that has been a part of the conversation now for at least 6, 7 years, we felt we would have to expand. So we did," says Joe Arthur,  Executive Director of the Food Bank, which serves 27 midstate counties, all the way up to the New York border.

The nonprofit supplies places like Calvary with some of the food to them pass on to their clients - that’s what they’re called by leaders in the system.

The distribution points often have their own food drives and fundraisers to pass out more food.

But Arthur says there's a limit to what they can do.

"The answer is not to keep building more and bigger food banks. The answer is to help grow the economy, create jobs, and let’s get people back in the grocery stores, buying their products, instead of going to food banks. And that’s really lost in the debate in DC."

Deborah Beck, who says she's been denied food stamps, has been picking up food at the Cupboard at Calvary on and off for about a year now.

"I was out of money and to make ends meet, I didn’t know how to get some groceries, and so I started looking up places in the area and this one has helped me."

Beck says she really likes that workers treat her with respect and don’t make her feel embarrassed for asking for help.

Some in Pennsylvania who do get food stamps may soon have to turn to food banks more, though.

The Coalition Against Hunger estimates 175,000 households in the state will lose at least part of the food stamp benefit under the new farm bill.

That concerns Joe Arthur with the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank.

He says after its latest expansion, cuts will only make things more difficult.

"You can’t keep building to the sky. There has to be a better answer."

Even after the latest farm bill, the debate will go on.

Democrats and Republicans in Washington have two different answers: many in the GOP want to cut the program to save money, while those on the left have asked to keep the program as is, or make just minor changes.

Published in News

Tagged under

back to top

Post a comment

Comments: 4

  • Larry img 2014-02-24 07:40

    It is great that these food banks and other non profits are picking up the slack of the lost funding in welfare benefits.

    Joe Pitts and republicans objections to food and other welfare benefits for families are not the Americans we are.

    That the national debt is a cause that we cannot feed Americans is just another indication that it is not debt being our problem, but that we do have a revenue problem.

    To say that the welfare system is plagued with fraud is not true either. The fraud is identified to be less than four percent. I can tell you that any private institution to have four percent shrink, that manager would be getting a pat on the back.

    Joe Pitts then objects to a living wage to help get these poor working families off welfare.

    Joe Pitts is not serving Lancaster County or America, but only owes his allegiance to conservative money of the American Legislative Council (ALEC) and the State Policy Network (SPN)

  • anon img 2014-02-24 16:50

    Article says food stamps will be cut $9 billion over the next ten years. I didn't see anything that says food stamps went UP $42 billion over the last FIVE years. A little honesty and complete reporting would be appreciated.

  • Larry img 2014-02-24 18:32

    Anon

    Can you document your statement.

    Can you make it relevant to the increased need.

    Your referenced documentation with your honesty will be enlightening.

    Let me know if I may assist you with referenced documents.

  • anon img 2014-02-26 10:44

    Food Stamp costs for 2008 $37.6 billion, for 2013 $79.9 billion = increase of $42.2 billion. Source: usda.gov
    Increases need: 1. recession, 2. loosened requirements to qualify. Source: numerous articles, use Google.
    As for "needs", it seems like everybody has needs that they want somebody else to pay for. Below are some of them (with the source):
    2012 Congressional Budget Office:
    $251 billion Medicaid (70 million people)
    $21 billion Part D low income subsidy
    $54 billion EITC
    $50 billion SSI
    $28 billion CTC
    $17 billion TANF
    $36 billion subsidized housing
    $34 billion Pell grants
    $18 billion child nutrition
    I hope you are enlightened, and thanks for your offer to help.

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »

witf's Public Insight Network

National Edward R. Murrow Awards

DuPont Columbia Awards

Support Local Journalism

Latest News from NPR

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »