News

AG argues against court hearing Sandusky appeal

Written by The Associated Press | Nov 14, 2013 1:06 PM
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for gavel bench.jpg

(Harrisburg) -- Pennsylvania prosecutors say there's no reason the state Supreme Court should take up Jerry Sandusky's molestation conviction on appeal.

State court officials on Thursday posted a filing by the Pennsylvania attorney general's office that said the former Penn State assistant football coach hasn't put forward ``special and important reasons'' the justices should consider the appeal.

Sandusky argues his lawyers were rushed to trial and prosecutors improperly referred to his decision not to testify.

He also says the trial judge should have issued a jury instruction on the delay in reporting by his victims and that the judge erred by telling jurors to weigh evidence of his good character against all other evidence in the case.

Sandusky's lawyer says his earlier filing laid out why the appeal ought to be heard.

Published in News

Tagged under ,

back to top

Post a comment

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »

witf's Public Insight Network

Real Life Real Issues

Grave 43: Remembering Pony

National Edward R. Murrow Awards

DuPont Columbia Awards

Support Local Journalism

Latest News from NPR

Support for witf is provided by:

Become a witf sponsor today »